Richardson Callahan & Frederick LLP - Attorneys At Law

Welcome

Richardson Callahan & Frederick LLP
Attorneys At Law

4205 Balmoral Drive, Suite 101
Huntsville, Alabama 35801-4881

Telephone: (256) 533-2440
Facsimile: (256) 533-2441

MAILING ADDRESS:

Post Office Box 18667
Huntsville, Alabama 35804-8667

Richardson Callahan & Frederick LLP is a law firm of highly experienced attorneys with a distinctive civil practice. Our firm has been recognized to be among the best in the Huntsville / North Alabama area in the areas of business and commercial litigation, corporate law, employment law, franchising, government contracts, estate planning and personal injury. While Richardson Callahan & Frederick LLP is primarily a litigation and dispute resolution firm representing clients ranging from small businesses to FORTUNE 500 corporations, the firm also represents individuals in transactional matters such as real estate, and in personal concerns involving estate planning and probate litigation.

Richardson Callahan & Frederick LLP is a big firm in a small box with a history of achieving successful results for its clients. Choosing the right firm to represent you is an important one. We encourage you to learn more about who we are and what we do. Explore our web site and then call (256) 533-2440 to see how we can help you.


Legal News...

Business
[11/06] Ahead of the Bell: Nvidia up after beating views
[11/06] Former Iowa slaughterhouse manager testifies
[11/06] Dolan more than doubles 3Q profit
More...

Top Headlines
[11/06] Classmate: Hasan said terror fight a war on Islam
[11/06] NYC man charged in $365K fitness Web site scam
[11/06] Virginia Supreme Court upholds power line plan
More...

Government Contracts

[11/02] Sec'y of U.S. Air Force v. Commemorative Air Force
In United States Air Force's (USAF) suit against Commemorative Air Force (CAF) for breach of contract, replevin, and a declaratory judgment that it violated the terms of a 1996 donation certificate concerning an F-82 aircraft, district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiff and denying CAF's motion for summary judgment is affirmed, as there is no genuine issue of material fact that CAF's attempt to trade the F-82 violated the terms of the 1996 donation certificate, which called for title to revest in the USAF if CAF no longer desired to return the aircraft.
More...

Intellectual Property

[11/06] In re 1800Mattress.com IP., LLC
Final decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Board) refusing registration of the mark "Mattress.com" is affirmed as the Board's decision finding the mark generic in relation to the recited services was supported by substantial evidence.
More...

Labor & Employment Law

[11/04] Liberty Mut. ins. Co. v. Hurlbut
In a constitutional challenge to two amendments to the New York Workers' Compensation Law, the district court's judgment abstaining from the case is affirmed where Burford abstention was appropriate because federal court intervention would be disruptive of a carefully established state system, and might also yield inconsistent and therefore conflicting results.
More...


The following language is required pursuant to Rule 7.2, Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct: No representation is made that the quality of the legal services performed is greater than the quality of the legal services performed by other lawyers.

Copyright © 2009 by Richardson Callahan & Frederick LLP. All rights reserved. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include this copyright statement.